OnlyFans Agency USAAgency terms, compared

This site is operated by Starvi Digital LLC, owner of LuxOnly, which appears in this comparison.

Chat-only service

Chatting Wizard: published terms and score (2026)

Not publishedOnlyFansEnglish, SpanishRead Nov 12, 2026 · next reading by Feb 10, 2027

3.8 /106 of 16 points · 4 published in full

PublishedPartlyNot found

Answer · updated

Chatting Wizard scores 3.8/10 on our 16 criteria (chat-only service). It publishes in full: commission published with its base, nothing upfront, age backed by a public record, scale published. Not found on its website: payout route, content ownership, exit-fee policy, post-exit commission policy, reporting, leak protection, exit handover, who shouldn't sign.

Summary by block

Control of your account1.7
Freedom to leave1.3
Clear money6.7
Service explained1.7
Verifiable company8.3

The 16 criteria

Swipe to see all columns →

CriterionWhat we found
1. Creator keeps the loginPartly
Access through an invite to its chat tool, no credentials asked. (our summary of the page)Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
2. Direct payoutsNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
3. Creator owns the contentNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
4. Minimum term and notice publishedPartly
“There are no long-term contracts and no upfront payments”
No long contracts; no notice in days.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
5. No exit penaltyNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
6. No commission after exitNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
7. Commission published with its basePublished
“We charge a commission on the net revenue we generate”
12.5–20% of the net the chat brings in.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
8. Nothing upfrontPublished
“There are no long-term contracts and no upfront payments”
Nothing upfront.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
9. Reporting publishedNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
10. Content protectionNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
11. Exit handover explainedNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
12. Chat policyPartly
“we monitor the work of our chatters 24/7”
Supervised human chat.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
13. Says who shouldn't signNot found
Not stated on the pages we read.Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
14. Identifiable companyPartly
Its terms name Only Elite Marketing LLC, no address. (our summary of the page)Source: chattingwizard.com/terms · read Nov 12, 2026
15. Age backed by a public recordPublished
Record date: May 22, 2024
Domain chattingwizard.com registered May 22, 2024 (RDAP). A domain date doesn't prove when the company started.Source: rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026
16. Scale publishedPublished
Says 150+ team and 80+ accounts. (our summary of the page)Source: chattingwizard.com · read Nov 12, 2026

Key conditions

Commission
Published 12.5–20% of the net the chat brings in.
Term and notice
Partly No long contracts; no notice in days.
Exit fee
Not found Not stated on the pages we read.
After you leave
Not found Not stated on the pages we read.
Upfront costs
Published Nothing upfront.
Login and 2FA
Partly Access through an invite to its chat tool, no credentials asked.
Payouts
Not found Not stated on the pages we read.
Content
Not found Not stated on the pages we read.

Age: stated vs documented

Documented: Published Domain chattingwizard.com registered May 22, 2024 (RDAP). A domain date doesn't prove when the company started.

A founding year an agency states about itself is shown when we record it, but it doesn't score (rule R4). At this reading we recorded none.

Notes

Chat only, not full management: compared separately.

What others say (doesn't score)

No third-party reviews recorded at this reading. Reviews and other rankings never change the score (rule R5).

16 questions to ask Chatting Wizard before signing

  1. Who keeps your password and 2FA? (not fully published)
  2. Does platform money land directly in your bank? (not fully published)
  3. Is your content still yours when you leave? (not fully published)
  4. How long are you tied in, and how much notice do you give? (not fully published)
  5. Does leaving cost you money? (not fully published)
  6. Do they keep taking a cut after you leave? (not fully published)
  7. Do they publish their cut and what it's calculated on?
  8. Do they charge anything to get started?
  9. What reports do you get, and how often? (not fully published)
  10. Do they monitor leaks and file takedowns (DMCA)? (not fully published)
  11. What happens to access and material the day you leave? (not fully published)
  12. Who talks to your fans, and within what limits? (not fully published)
  13. Do they tell you when NOT to sign? (not fully published)
  14. Do you know which company you'd sign with? (not fully published)
  15. How old is the agency, according to a public record?
  16. How many people work there, and how many creators do they manage?

Who it may suit

On what it publishes, Chatting Wizard is strongest on verifiable company (8.3/10) and weakest on freedom to leave (1.3/10). If that area matters most to you, ask for the missing points in writing before you sign.

Compare with LuxOnly

Our agency scores 8.1/10 with the same rules. See both side by side. This site is operated by Starvi Digital LLC, owner of LuxOnly, which appears in this comparison.

Sources

Reply and corrections

Chatting Wizard can reply from an email address on its own domain; we publish the reply word for word on this page. See right of reply. No reply received at this reading.

Related

How to cite this page: OnlyFans Agency USA. “Chatting Wizard: published terms and score”. https://onlyfansagencyusa.com/agencies/chatting-wizard/, updated Nov 12, 2026. CC BY 4.0.